The Dog Scrap

I wonder if I am alone in being irritated by reports about the goings on at Cern. What really grates are the blasphemous references to a "God particle".

This is the so-called Higgs' Bosun which should, in my opinion, be called the dog particle. Anyone who has listened to Radio Four's "The Archers" of a certain vintage will know what I mean.

Higgs was one of the most interesting characters in the programme not least because, to the best of my knowledge, he never spoke. He seems to have been some kind of personal assistant or odd job man to Jack Woolley, erstwhile owner of the posh hotel, Grey Gables. The great love of Jack Woolley's life was his dog, Captain. As a busy businessman- who isn't?- Mr Woolley would often ask Higgs to take Captain for walkies. Now, I haven't concrete proof of this yet, you understand, but it is very likely that even if I don't have the evidence soon there is every likelihood that, barring the odd mishap and- all things being equal- I might have potential sighting of something which may or may not prove what I've been saying for sometime- that Higgs also may have had a dog of his own. This dog, if it really existed- in so much as any characters in a radio soap may be said to "exist" -would in all probability have a name inspired by the naval theme employed in the naming of his master's dog. It would be called "Bosun" or "Bo'sun"( written "Boatswain"). If you have managed to follow all this (and you really do have to be clever to believe what some scientists believe!) you will experience the "Eureka" moment when it dawns upon you that since this creature belonged to Mr Higgs it will have been known, not as "Woolley's Captain", but as "Higgs's Bosun".

And what if we find conclusive proof that Higgs's dog had another name?
Wel...l yes... that just goes to show how endlessly fascinating Science is because we would have to change all our theories. Either way, it's a job for life!

Thoughts on the new translation 2

It has been a tremendous privilege for me to be able to attend mass on an almost daily basis since the new translation was introduced in our parish just over two months ago.

Initially I made the effort because I knew it would take some time to take the new responses to heart. One doesn't overcome the habits of the best part of a lifetime overnight and so I am still picking up my laminated card as I enter the church and following the words very carefully. Although those words, which we laity use, are important they are by no means the only, or indeed the most striking, of the changes.

I have been bowled over by the beauty of the Eucharistic Prayers. First up was the Second Eucharistic Prayer with its reference to the "dewfall" of the Holy Spirit evoking one of my favourite prayers- the Veni Sancte Spiritus. Then I heard the Third Eucharistic Prayer with its mention of "the rising of the sun to its setting". Neither, however, quite prepares one for the sheer grandeur of the First Eucharistic Prayer- the Roman Canon! Here we have not only all those apostles and martyrs crowding in but also "Abel the just, Abraham...Melchisedech..." And it is quite clear too that it is God Himself who is being addressed.
The tone is reverential and, as I have perhaps said before, it is not the new translation that requires justifying or explaining. Rather is it why we have had to bear with something so strikingly inferior for so long when many of its defects were obvious from day one. But I begin to digress.

Perhaps, in my view, the strongest argument for the new translation is the extent of the scriptural resonance which it has revealed. One of the most obvious examples of this in the people's responses is seen in the Domine non sum dignus...Lord, I am not worthy...". The way in which the words are patterned after the Centurion's statement in the Gospel takes us into that event so that what on one level is a bald statement of fact ("I am not worthy") is also both a reminder of our need of faith and humility like that of the centurion and a prayer for the healing we need. Nor is the meaning exhausted there. Like so much of scripture it is like a deep well from which one can continue to draw without it ever becoming exhausted. Nor, as I have begun to appreciate, is this quality of scriptural resonance restricted to the Ordinary of the Mass.

This morning, it being an Advent weekday, the Collect, Prayer over the Offerings and Post Communion Prayer conveyed the Advent theme appropriately. I cannot now recall which of them it was- perhaps the Collect- which asked that we might be ready to greet the Lord at His coming "with lamps alight". At once one was reminded of the Wise and foolish virgins (or "bridesmaids" as the Jerusalem Bible calls them) of the parable! Please, please, please! Will someone just wake up to the fact that this is not just "flowery" or arbitrary, or "poetic" language for the sake of it! It is poetic, of course- but poetic in the sense that true poetry involves real communication - truth- expressed with economy and elegance. It is language that "touches the nerve" and sparks off a whole network of connections. In short it is "live".

Perhaps, then, noone will be surprised if I say that I cannot take seriously those who criticise the new translation. Perhaps there may be the odd infelicity or inelegant phrase but it is surely as nothing to the loose paraphrase which has served these last nearly forty years. It is as if the true meanings have been veiled all this time like the crucifix in Passiontide. Of course the point of that veiling is that it allows an unveiling- the effect of which is the enabling of a clearer view of what was always available to plain sight....

An interesting post!

http://vultus.stblogs.org/2011/12/the-blessed-virgin-mary-gate-o.html

Advent

New Missal

Our new Sunday Missals arrived today and I am delighted. I am particularly pleased that, as with the missals of my youth, English and Latin are printed side by side both for the Ordinary of the Mass and for the proper antiphons and prayers. Another attractive feature is the way in which the main chants of the mass- both Latin and English- are incorporated in this people's edition. It sends out a clear message that both Latin and Chant (in both languages) are "standard" and to be expected. In short it even looks more like the kind of missal envisaged by the fathers of the Council than those seen hitherto.

And a special treat- illustrations from the Psalter of Ingeborg of Denmark. This medieval manuscript is housed in the Musee Conde at the Chateau of Chantilly near Senlis which it (the chateau) was my privilege to view, but not yet visit, back in September.